Everyone’s situation comes with different costs. To provide a clearer picture, let’s break down the costs for a $200,000 portfolio, for example:
With Betterment Digital, you’ll pay a 0.25% management fee, which translates to $500 per year, along with approximately $100 in ETF fees. If you opt for Betterment Premium, which provides access to certified financial planners, the annual management fee jumps to 0.65%. This would cost $1,300 per year for a $200,000 portfolio, in addition to the same $100 in ETF fees. By contrast, Wealthfront charges a flat 0.25% management fee across all accounts, resulting in $500 per year for the same portfolio, plus ~$100 in ETF fees.
The fee difference between Betterment Premium and the other options is substantial. For a $200,000 portfolio, you’d pay $800 more annually for Premium. This additional cost could be justified if you take full advantage of the CFP® access provided by the Premium plan. For example, personalized financial guidance for major decisions like retirement planning, tax optimization, or inheritance could save you thousands in the long term. However, if you’re unlikely to use these services, the extra expense might not be worth it.
High-income earners, particularly those living in states with high tax rates like California or New York, might find that Wealthfront’s tax-loss harvesting offsets any fee differences. Its direct indexing feature, available for accounts with $100,000 or more, offers a level of tax optimization that could result in significant savings for those in higher tax brackets.
On the other hand, advanced tax features may not deliver the same benefits for investors in lower tax brackets. In such cases, Betterment Digital’s robust educational resources and user-friendly tools might hold more value, particularly for those who are newer to investing or looking to better understand the financial decisions they’re making.
